How Are Prices For Goods And Services Determined In Markets?

System for trading electric energy

In economic terms, electricity is a consumable energy resource capable of being bought, sold, and traded. An electricity market, as well power exchange or PX, is a system enabling purchases, through bids to purchase; sales, through offers to sell. Bids and offers use supply and demand principles to ready the price. Long-term contracts are like to power buy agreements and generally considered private bi-lateral transactions between counterparties.

Wholesale transactions (bids and offers) in electricity are typically cleared and settled by the market operator or a special-purpose contained entity charged exclusively with that function. Market place operators practise non clear trades but often require knowledge of the trade in society to maintain generation and load balance. The bolt within an electrical market generally consist of two types: power and energy. Ability is the metered net electrical transfer rate at any given moment and is measured in megawatts (MW). Energy is electricity that flows through a metered point for a given period and is measured in megawatt hours (MWh).

Markets for energy-related commodities trade net generation output for a number of intervals normally in increments of 5, 15 and 60 minutes. Markets for ability-related commodities required and managed by (and paid for by) market place operators to ensure reliability, are considered ancillary services and include such names every bit spinning reserve, non-spinning reserve, operating reserves, responsive reserve, regulation upwards, regulation downward, and installed capacity.

In improver, for virtually major operators, there are markets for transmission congestion and electricity derivatives such as electricity futures and options, which are actively traded. These markets developed every bit a result of the restructuring of electric power systems around the world. This process has often gone on in parallel with the restructuring of natural gas markets.

History [edit]

One controversial^{[ citation needed ]} introduction of energy market concepts and privatization to electric power systems took place in Republic of chile in the early 1980s, in parallel with other marketplace-oriented reforms associated with the Chicago Boys. The Chilean model was generally perceived as successful in bringing rationality and transparency to power pricing. Argentina improved on the Chilean model by imposing strict limits on market place concentration and past improving the structure of payments to units held in reserve to assure arrangement reliability. One of the main purposes of the introduction of market concepts in Argentina was to privatize existing generation avails (which had fallen into disrepair under the government-owned monopoly, resulting in frequent service interruptions) and to attract capital needed for rehabilitation of those assets and for system expansion. The World Depository financial institution was active in introducing a variety of hybrid markets in other Latin American nations, including Peru, Brazil, and Colombia, during the 1990s, with express success.

A quantum leap in electricity pricing theory occurred in 1988 when four professors at MIT and Boston Academy (Fred C. Schweppe, Michael C. Caramanis, Richard D. Tabors, and Roger Eastward. Bohn) published a book entitled, "Spot Pricing of Electricity".^{[ commendation needed ]} It presented the concept that prices at each location on a manual organisation should reflect the marginal toll of serving one additional unit of measurement of demand at that location. It and so proposed quantifying these prices by solving a systemwide cost minimization problem while complying with all of the system'south operational constraints, such as generator capacity limits, locational loads, line catamenia limits, etc. using linear programming software. The locational marginal prices then emerged as the shadow prices for relaxing the load limit at each location.

A key consequence for electricity markets occurred in 1990 when the Britain regime nether Margaret Thatcher privatised the Great britain electricity supply manufacture. The process followed past the British was then used as a model (or at least a catalyst) for the restructuring of several other Commonwealth countries, notably the National Electricity Markets of Commonwealth of australia and New Zealand and the Alberta Electricity Market in Canada.

In the U.s. the traditional vertically integrated electric utility model with a transmission system designed to serve its own customers worked extremely well for decades. As dependence on a reliable supply of electricity grew and electricity was transported over increasingly greater distances, wide area synchronous grid interconnections developed. Transactions were relatively few and more often than not scheduled well in advance.

However, in the last decade of the 20th century, some United States policy makers and academics asserted that the electric power industry would ultimately experience deregulation and contained system operators (ISOs) and regional transmission organizations (RTOs) were established. They were conceived as the style to handle the vastly increased number of transactions that take identify in a competitive environment. About a dozen states decided to deregulate but some pulled dorsum following the California electricity crunch of 2000 and 2001.

In unlike deregulation processes the institutions and marketplace designs were often very dissimilar only many of the underlying concepts were the aforementioned. These are: separate the potentially competitive functions of generation and retail from the natural monopoly functions of transmission and distribution; and establish a wholesale electricity market and a retail electricity marketplace. The role of the wholesale market is to allow trading between generators, retailers and other financial intermediaries both for short-term delivery of electricity (see spot cost) and for futurity delivery periods (see forward price).

Some states exempt non investor-owned utilities from some aspects of deregulation such as customer choice of supplier. For instance, some of the New England states exempt municipal lighting plants from several aspects of deregulation and these municipal utilities do non take to allow customers to purchase from competitive suppliers. Municipal utilities in these states tin can too opt to function as vertically-integrated utilities and operate generation assets both inside and outside of their service surface area to supply their utility customers as well as sell output to the marketplace.

Nature [edit]

Electricity is by its nature difficult to store and has to be available on demand. Consequently, unlike other products, it is not possible, under normal operating conditions, to keep information technology in stock, ration it or have customers queue for it. Furthermore, demand and supply vary continuously.

At that place is therefore a physical requirement for a decision-making agency, the transmission system operator, to coordinate the dispatch of generating units to meet the expected need of the organisation across the transmission grid. If there is a mismatch between supply and demand the generators speed up or slow down causing the system frequency (either 50 or 60 hertz) to increment or decrease. If the frequency falls exterior a predetermined range the system operator volition act to add or remove either generation or load.

The proportion of electricity lost in transmission and the level of congestion on any particular branch of the network will influence the economic dispatch of the generation units.

Markets may extend beyond national boundaries.

Wholesale electricity market [edit]

This article's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date data. Please help update this article to reverberate recent events or newly available information. (May 2020)

A wholesale electricity market exists when competing generators offer their electricity output to retailers. The retailers then re-price the electricity and take it to marketplace. While wholesale pricing used to exist the sectional domain of big retail suppliers, increasingly markets like New England are get-go to open up to end-users. Large end-users seeking to cut out unnecessary overhead in their energy costs are beginning to recognize the advantages inherent in such a purchasing movement. Consumers buying electricity directly from generators is a relatively recent miracle.

Ownership wholesale electricity is not without its drawbacks (market dubiousness, membership costs, fix fees, collateral investment, and organization costs, every bit electricity would need to be bought on a daily basis), however, the larger the stop user'south electrical load, the greater the benefit and incentive to make the switch.

For an economically efficient electricity wholesale market place to flourish it is essential that a number of criteria are met, namely the beingness of a coordinated spot market that has "bid-based, security-constrained, economic acceleration with nodal prices". These criteria have been largely adopted in the US, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore.^[ane]

Bid-based, security-constrained, economic dispatch with nodal prices [edit]

The system price in the twenty-four hours-ahead market place is, in principle, determined past matching offers from generators to bids from consumers at each node to develop a archetype supply and demand equilibrium price, commonly on an hourly interval, and is calculated separately for subregions in which the organisation operator'due south load flow model indicates that constraints will bind transmission imports.

The theoretical prices of electricity at each node on the network is a calculated "shadow price", in which it is causeless that one additional kilowatt-60 minutes is demanded at the node in question, and the hypothetical incremental cost to the arrangement that would upshot from the optimized redispatch of available units establishes the hypothetical product cost of the hypothetical kilowatt-60 minutes. This is known every bit locational marginal pricing (LMP) or nodal pricing and is used in some deregulated markets, most notably in the Midcontinent Contained Organisation Operator (MISO), PJM Interconnection, ERCOT, New York, and ISO New England markets in the United states,^[two] New Zealand,^[3] and in Singapore.^[4]

In do, the LMP algorithm described above is run, incorporating a security-constrained (defined below), least-cost dispatch calculation with supply based on the generators that submitted offers in the day-ahead market place, and need based on bids from load-serving entities draining supplies at the nodes in question.

Due to diverse non-convexities present in wholesale electricity markets, in the form of economies of scale, commencement-up and/or shut-downwardly costs, avoidable costs, indivisibilities, minimum supply requirements, etc., some suppliers may incur losses nether LMP, e.grand., because they may fail to recover their fixed cost through commodity payments only. To address this problem, various pricing schemes that elevator the price above marginal cost and/or provide side-payments (uplifts) have been proposed. Liberopoulos and Andrianesis (2016)^[5] review and compare several of these schemes on the price, uplifts, and profits that each scheme generates.

While in theory the LMP concepts are useful and not evidently subject field to manipulation, in do system operators accept substantial discretion over LMP results through the ability to classify units equally running in "out-of-merit acceleration", which are thereby excluded from the LMP calculation. In most systems, units that are dispatched to provide reactive power to back up manual grids are declared to be "out-of-merit" (fifty-fifty though these are typically the aforementioned units that are located in constrained areas and would otherwise result in scarcity signals). System operators besides normally bring units online to hold every bit "spinning-reserve" to protect against sudden outages or unexpectedly rapid ramps in demand, and declare them "out-of-merit". The effect is ofttimes a substantial reduction in clearing price at a time when increasing demand would otherwise result in escalating prices.

Researchers have noted that a variety of factors, including free energy price caps set well below the putative scarcity value of free energy, the effect of "out-of-merit" acceleration, the apply of techniques such as voltage reductions during scarcity periods with no corresponding scarcity price indicate, etc., results in a missing money trouble. The effect is that prices paid to suppliers in the "marketplace" are substantially beneath the levels required to stimulate new entry. The markets take therefore been useful in bringing efficiencies to brusque-term organization operations and acceleration, only have been a failure in what was advertised equally a principal do good: stimulating suitable new investment where information technology is needed, when it is needed.

In LMP markets, where constraints exist on a manual network, there is a need for more expensive generation to be dispatched on the downstream side of the constraint. Prices on either side of the constraint carve up giving rise to congestion pricing and constraint rentals.

A constraint can exist caused when a item branch of a network reaches its thermal limit or when a potential overload will occur due to a contingent result (e.g., failure of a generator or transformer or a line outage) on another part of the network. The latter is referred to as a security constraint. Transmission systems are operated to allow for continuity of supply even if a contingent event, similar the loss of a line, were to occur. This is known as a security constrained system.

In near systems the algorithm used is a "DC" model rather than an "Air-conditioning" model,^{[ clarification needed ]} so constraints and redispatch resulting from thermal limits are identified/predicted, but constraints and redispatch resulting from reactive power deficiencies are not. Some systems accept marginal losses into business relationship. The prices in the real-time marketplace are determined by the LMP algorithm described above, balancing supply from available units. This process is carried out for each 5-minute, half-hour or hr (depending on the market) interval at each node on the manual grid. The hypothetical redispatch adding that determines the LMP must respect security constraints and the redispatch calculation must leave sufficient margin to maintain system stability in the result of an unplanned outage anywhere on the arrangement. This results in a spot market with "bid-based, security-constrained, economic acceleration with nodal prices".

Many established markets practice non employ nodal pricing, examples being the Britain, EPEX SPOT (nearly European countries), and Nord Pool Spot (Nordic and Baltic countries).

Risk management [edit]

Financial risk management is often a high priority for participants in deregulated electricity markets due to the substantial price and volume risks that the markets tin exhibit. A event of the complexity of a wholesale electricity market can exist extremely high price volatility at times of peak demand and supply shortages. The particular characteristics of this price risk are highly dependent on the physical fundamentals of the market place such every bit the mix of types of generation plant and relationship between need and weather patterns. Price hazard can be manifest by toll "spikes" which are difficult to predict and price "steps" when the underlying fuel or plant position changes for long periods.

Volume risk is oftentimes used to denote the phenomenon whereby electricity market participants have uncertain volumes or quantities of consumption or production. For example, a retailer is unable to accurately predict consumer demand for any particular hour more than a few days into the futurity and a producer is unable to predict the precise time that they volition have constitute outage or shortages of fuel. A compounding gene is likewise the common correlation betwixt extreme toll and book events. For case, price spikes often occur when some producers have plant outages or when some consumers are in a period of summit consumption. The introduction of substantial amounts of intermittent power sources such as wind energy may affect market prices.

Electricity retailers, who in aggregate purchase from the wholesale market, and generators who in aggregate sell to the wholesale marketplace, are exposed to these price and volume effects and to protect themselves from volatility, they will enter into "hedge contracts" with each other. The construction of these contracts varies past regional market due to different conventions and market structures. However, the two simplest and about mutual forms are elementary stock-still price forrad contracts for physical delivery and contracts for differences where the parties agree a strike price for defined fourth dimension periods. In the case of a contract for difference, if a resulting wholesale price index (as referenced in the contract) in any time menses is higher than the "strike" price, the generator volition refund the difference betwixt the "strike" price and the actual toll for that catamenia. Similarly a retailer volition refund the deviation to the generator when the bodily price is less than the "strike cost". The actual price index is sometimes referred to every bit the "spot" or "pool" price, depending on the market.

Many other hedging arrangements, such as swing contracts, virtual bidding, Financial Transmission Rights, phone call options and put options are traded in sophisticated electricity markets. In full general they are designed to transfer financial risks between participants.

Wholesale electricity markets [edit]

Argentina – see Electricity sector in Argentine republic
Australia – see Electricity sector in Australia
- Western Australia (WEM) – Australian Free energy Market Operator (AEMO)
- East Declension (NEM) – Australian Energy Marketplace Operator (AEMO)
Republic of austria – see EPEX SPOT and EXAA Energy Exchange^[6]
Belgium – see APX Grouping
Brazil – run across Electricity sector in Brazil
Canada – see Electricity sector in Canada
Chile – encounter Electricity sector in Chile
Colombia – come across Electricity sector in Republic of colombia
Czech republic – Czech electricity and gas market place operator^[vii] and Power Substitution Central Europe (PXE)^[8]
Croatia - Croation Power Exchange (CROPEX)
France – see Electricity sector in France and EPEX SPOT
Germany – see Electricity sector in Germany, European Energy Exchange AG (EEX)^[9] and EPEX SPOT
Hungary – Hungarian Ability Commutation HUPX^[10] and Ability Substitution Central Europe (PXE)^[8]
India – see Indian Energy Substitution and Power Exchange India Limited (PXIL)^[eleven]
Republic of ireland – Unmarried Electricity Market Operator (SEMO)^[12]
Italy – GME^[13]
Nippon – see Electricity sector in Nihon and Japan Electric Power Exchange (JEPX)^[xiv]
Korea – Korea Ability Exchange (KPX)^[15]
Mexico – Centro Nacional de Control de Energía (CENACE)^[16]
Netherlands – come across APX-ENDEX
New Zealand – come across Electricity sector in New Zealand and New Zealand Electricity Market place
Philippines – Philippine Wholesale Electricity Spot Market^[17]
Poland – Polish Ability Exchange (POLPX)^[18]
Portugal – OMI-Polo Español, S.A. (OMIE),^[19] OMIP,^[20] Sociedad Rectora del Mercado de Productos Derivados, S.A. (MEFF),^[21] and European Energy Exchange AG (EEX)^[9]
Scandinavia – see Nord Pool Spot
Slovakia – Ability Exchange Cardinal Europe (PXE)^[8]
Espana – OMI-Polo Español, S.A. (OMIE),^[19] OMIP,^[xx] Sociedad Rectora del Mercado de Productos Derivados, S.A. (MEFF),^[21] and EEX^[9]
Sultante of Oman – Oman Electricity Market^[22]
Russian federation – Merchandise Organisation Administrator (ATS)^[23]
Singapore – Energy Marketplace Authority of Singapore (EMA)^[24] and Energy Market Company (EMC)^[25]
Turkey – run into Electricity sector in Turkey, Turkish Electricity Market place^[26]
U.k. – see APX-ENDEX and Elexon^[27]
United States – summarized past the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).^[28]
- California – California ISO^[29]
- ERCOT Market in Texas^[30]
- Midwest – Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc (MISO Free energy)^[31]
- New England market^[32]
- New York – New York Contained Organization Operator (NYISO)^[33]
- PJM Interconnection for all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Northward Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.
- Southwest – Southwest Ability Pool, Inc^[34]
Vietnam – Vietnam wholesale electricity market (VWEM). Operated by EVN^[35]

Electrical power exchanges [edit]

An electrical ability substitution is a commodities commutation dealing with electrical power:

Indian Energy Exchange
APX Group
Energy Exchange Austria
European Energy Exchange
European Ability Exchange
HUPX Hungarian Power Exchange
Nord Pool Equally
Powernext

Retail electricity market [edit]

A retail electricity market place exists when end-use customers tin cull their supplier from competing electricity retailers; one term used in the United states for this type of consumer choice is 'energy choice'. A separate issue for electricity markets is whether or not consumers face existent-time pricing (prices based on the variable wholesale toll) or a price that is set in another style, such as average annual costs. In many markets, consumers exercise non pay based on the real-time cost, and hence accept no incentive to reduce demand at times of high (wholesale) prices or to shift their demand to other periods. Need response may use pricing mechanisms or technical solutions to reduce peak demand.

Generally, electricity retail reform follows from electricity wholesale reform. However, information technology is possible to have a single electricity generation visitor and even so take retail competition. If a wholesale toll can be established at a node on the transmission grid and the electricity quantities at that node can be reconciled, competition for retail customers within the distribution organisation beyond the node is possible. In the German market, for example, large, vertically integrated utilities compete with ane some other for customers on a more or less open up grid.

Although market structures vary, in that location are some mutual functions that an electricity retailer has to be able to perform, or enter into a contract for, in social club to compete finer. Failure or incompetence in the execution of one or more of the following has led to some dramatic financial disasters:

Billing
Credit command
Customer management via an efficient call eye
Distribution apply-of-organization contract
Reconciliation understanding
"Pool" or "spot marketplace" purchase agreement
Hedge contracts – contracts for differences to manage "spot price" run a risk

The two chief areas of weakness accept been risk management and billing. In the United states of america in 2001, California's flawed regulation of retail competition led to the California electricity crunch and left incumbent retailers field of study to high spot prices but without the ability to hedge confronting these.^[36] In the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland a retailer, Independent Energy, with a large customer base went bust when it could not collect the money due from customers.^[37]

Competitive retail needs open admission to distribution and manual wires. This in turn requires that prices must be set up for both these services. They must also provide appropriate returns to the owners of the wires and encourage efficient location of power plants. There are 2 types of fees, the access fee and the regular fee. The access fee covers the price of having and accessing the network of wires available, or the right to use the existing manual and distribution network. The regular fee reflects the marginal cost of transferring electricity through the existing network of wires.

New engineering is bachelor and has been piloted past the US Department of Free energy that may be better suited to real-time market place pricing. A potential use of consequence-driven SOA (service-oriented architecture) could exist a virtual electricity market place where habitation clothes dryers can bid on the cost of the electricity they use in a real-time market place pricing organization.^[38] The real-time market cost and command system could turn habitation electricity customers into active participants in managing the power grid and their monthly utility bills.^[39] Customers tin can set limits on how much they would pay for electricity to run a wearing apparel dryer, for example, and electricity providers willing to transmit power at that price would be alerted over the grid and could sell the electricity to the dryer.^[40]

On ane side, consumer devices tin bid for ability based on how much the owner of the device were willing to pay, set up ahead of time by the consumer.^[41] On the other side, suppliers can enter bids automatically from their electricity generators, based on how much information technology would price to showtime up and run the generators. Further, the electricity suppliers could perform real-fourth dimension market assay to make up one's mind return-on-investment for optimizing profitability or reducing stop-user cost of appurtenances. The effects of a competitive retail electricity market are mixed beyond states, but generally appear to lower prices in states with high participation and raise prices in states that have niggling customer participation.^[42]

Consequence-driven SOA software could allow homeowners to customize many different types of electricity devices found inside their dwelling house to a desired level of condolement or economy. The result-driven software could also automatically reply to changing electricity prices, in as fiddling as five-minute intervals. For instance, to reduce the home owner's electricity usage in peak periods (when electricity is near expensive), the software could automatically lower the target temperature of the thermostat on the key heating system (in winter) or raise the target temperature of the thermostat on the fundamental cooling arrangement (in summer).

Electricity market feel [edit]

In the main, feel in the introduction of wholesale and retail contest has been mixed. Many regional markets have achieved some success and the ongoing trend continues to be towards deregulation and introduction of competition. However, in 2000/2001^[43] major failures such as the California electricity crisis and the Enron debacle acquired a slow downward in the footstep of alter and in some regions an increase in market regulation and reduction in competition. However, this trend is widely regarded as a temporary one against the longer term trend towards more open up and competitive markets.^[44]

Withal the favorable light in which market place solutions are viewed conceptually, the "missing money" problem has to date proved intractable. If electricity prices were to motility to the levels needed to incentivize new merchant (i.e., market-based) transmission and generation, the costs to consumers would be politically difficult.

The increment in annual costs to consumers in New England alone were calculated at $iii billion during the contempo^{[ when? ]} FERC hearings on the NEPOOL market structure. Several mechanisms that are intended to incent new investment where it is most needed past offering enhanced capacity payments (but just in zones where generation is projected to be short) have been proposed for NEPOOL, PJM and NYPOOL, and go under the generic heading of "locational capacity" or LICAP (the PJM version is chosen the "Reliability Pricing Model", or "RPM").^[45] There is substantial doubt equally to whether whatever of these mechanisms will in fact incent new investment, given the regulatory hazard and chronic instability of the market place rules in US systems, and there are substantial concerns that the result will instead be to increase revenues to incumbent generators, and costs to consumers, in the constrained areas.^{[ citation needed ]}

Capacity market [edit]

This section needs expansion. Y'all can aid by adding to it. (Nov 2019)

Turkey [edit]

The capacity mechanism^[46] is claimed to be a machinery for subsiding coal in Turkey,^[47] and has been criticised past some economists, as they say it encourages strategic chapters withholding.^[48]

Great britain [edit]

The Capacity Market is a part of the British government'southward Electricity Market place Reform packet.^[49] According to the Section for Business, Free energy and Industrial Strategy "the Chapters Market will ensure security of electricity supply by providing a payment for reliable sources of capacity, alongside their electricity revenues, to ensure they deliver energy when needed. This volition encourage the investment we need to replace older power stations and provide backup for more intermittent and inflexible depression carbon generation sources". ^[50]

Auctions [edit]

This section needs to be updated. Please aid update this article to reflect recent events or newly available data. (July 2020)

Two Capacity Market place Auctions are held each year. The T-4 auction buys capacity to be delivered in 4 years' time and the T-1 auction is a superlative-up auction held only ahead of each delivery year.^[51] The following Capacity Marketplace Auction results accept been published:

2014, for delivery in 2018^[52]
2015, for delivery in 2019/20^[53]
2016, for delivery in 2020/21^[54]

Definitions [edit]

The National Filigree 'Guidance document for Chapters Market participants' provides the post-obit definitions:

"CMU (Chapters Market Unit) – this is the Generating Unit(s) or DSR Capacity that is being prequalified and will ultimately provide Chapters should they secure a Capacity Agreement".^[55]
"A Generating CMU is a generating unit that provides electricity, is capable of being controlled independently from whatsoever other generating unit of measurement outside the CMU, is measured past 1 or more than half hourly meters and has a connection capacity greater than 2MW".^[55]
"A DSR CMU is a delivery past a person to provide an amount of capacity past a method of Demand Side Response by either reducing the DSR customers import of electricity, as measured by one or more half hourly meters, exporting electricity generated by 1 or more permitted on site generating units or varying need for active power in response to changing system frequency".^[55]

Frequency control market place [edit]

Within many electricity markets, in that location are specialised markets for the provision of frequency command and ancillary services (FCAS). If the electricity system has supply (generation) in backlog of electricity demand, at any instant, then the frequency will increase. Past contrast, if in that location is insufficient supply of electricity to run across demand at whatsoever time and so the organization frequency will fall. If it falls besides far, the power system will become unstable. Frequency control markets are in add-on to, and separate from, the wholesale electricity pool market. These markets serve to incentivise the provision of frequency heighten services or frequency lower services. Frequency heighten involves rapid provision of extra electricity generation, so that supply and need tin can be more closely matched.^[56]

References [edit]

^ Criteria for economically efficient electricity wholesale markets – Criteria for economically efficient wholesale markets
^ Neuhoff; Boyd (July 2011). "International Experiences of Nodal Pricing Implementation" (PDF). Climate Policy Initiative.
^ Alvey, Trevor; Goodwin, Doug; Ma, Xingwang; Streiffert, Dan; Lord's day, David (1998). "A security-constrained bid-clearing system for the New Zealand wholesale electricity market". IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. thirteen (ii): 340–346. Bibcode:1998ITPSy..13..340A. doi:10.1109/59.667349.
^ "Nodal Cost Difference by Transmission Loss". world wide web.emcsg.com . Retrieved 2022-02-26 .
^ Liberopoulos, George; Andrianesis, Panagiotis (2016-01-22). "Critical Review of Pricing Schemes in Markets with Non-Convex Costs". Operations Research. 64 (one): 17–31. doi:10.1287/opre.2015.1451. ISSN 0030-364X.
^ "Energy Commutation Austria". en.exaa.at. Archived from the original on 2007-x-31. Retrieved 2021-11-22 .
^ "OTE, a.s." 2017-07-22.
^ ^a ^b ^c "Power Exchange Central Europe, a. s." 2017-07-22. Archived from the original on 2017-08-11. Retrieved 2017-07-21 . For Czechia, Slovakia and Republic of hungary.
^ ^a ^b ^c "European Energy Exchange AG". 2017-07-22.
^ "Hungarian Power Substitution (HUPX)". 2017-07-22.
^ "Power Exchange India Express (PXIL)". 2017-07-22.
^ "Single Electricity Market place Operator (SEMO)". 2017-07-22. SEMO is a joint venture between EirGrid PLC and SONI Limited.
^ "Gestore dei Mercati Energetici SpA (GME)". 2017-07-22.
^ "Japan Electric Power Exchange (JEPX)". Archived from the original on 2013-ten-02. Retrieved 2017-07-21 .
^ "Korea Ability Exchange (KPX)". 2017-07-22.
^ "CENACE (CENACE)". 2017-07-22.
^ "Philippine Electricity Market Corporation". 2017-07-22.
^ "Towarowa Giełda Energii". 2019-02-18.
^ ^a ^b "OMI-Polo Español, Southward.A. (OMIE)". 2017-07-22. Iberian Electricity Market – solar day-ahead spot markets.
^ ^a ^b "OMIP – The Iberian Energy Derivatives Commutation". Iberian Electricity Market – derivatives markets.
^ ^a ^b "Sociedad Rectora del Mercado de Productos Derivados, S.A. (MEFF)". 2017-07-22.
^ "The Sultanate of oman Power and Water Procurement Company (OPWP)". world wide web.omanpwp.om . Retrieved 2021-11-22 .
^ "Trade Organisation Ambassador (ATS)" (in Russian). 2017-07-22.
^ "Free energy Marketplace Authority of Singapore (EMA)". 2017-07-22.
^ "Energy Market Company (EMC)". 2017-07-22.
^ "EPİAŞ". www.epias.com.tr . Retrieved 2021-11-22 .
^ "Elexon". 2017-07-22.
^ Electric Ability Markets: National Overview
^ "California ISO". 2017-07-22. California ISO
^ "Electric Reliability Council of Texas". www.ercot.com . Retrieved 2021-11-22 .
^ "Midcontinent Independent Organisation Operator, Inc (MISO Energy)". 2017-07-22.
^ "ISO New England". world wide web.iso-ne.com . Retrieved 2021-11-22 .
^ "New York Independent Organization Operator". 2017-07-22.
^ "Southwest Power Puddle, Inc". 2017-07-22. Southwest market
^ "Vietnam Electricity". en.evn.com.vn . Retrieved 2021-11-22 .
^ MANIFESTO ON THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY Crunch, Plant of Management, Innovation and Arrangement at the University of California, Berkeley, 26 January 2001, archived from the original on 5 February 2012
^ Independent Energy collapses with customers still owing £119m in bills – The Independent
^ "Event-driven SOA enables homes to purchase electricity". Searchsoa.techtarget.com. Retrieved 2012-02-02 .
^ IBM Podcast How it works Archived 2011-01-25 at the Wayback Machine
^ "10 Jan 2008 Filigree project lets consumer handle electricity use – United States". IBM. 2008-01-10. Retrieved 2012-02-02 .
^ "PNNL: News – Department of Free energy putting power in the hands of consumers through engineering". Pacific Northwest National Lab. 2008-01-09. Retrieved 2012-02-02 .
^ Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Did Residential Electricity Rates Fall Later Retail Competition? A Dynamic Panel Assay, May 2011
^ Power Failure The current scandals pale in comparing to the energy industry'southward biggest problem: massive debt it can't repay.
^ "The Bumpy Road to Energy Deregulation". EnPowered. 2016-03-28.
^ Markets and Operations PJM
^ "ELEKTRİK PİYASASI KAPASİTE MEKANİZMASI YÖNETMELİĞİ," Resmî Gazete Issue:30307 Article 1 and Article six Clause ii) h), xx Jan 2018
^ Sabadus, Aureola (vi December 2017). "Comment: Turkey, Poland - How politics damage free energy markets". Independent Article Intelligence Services. Archived from the original on 2019-08-31. Retrieved 22 Nov 2021.
^ Durmaz, Tunç; Acar, Sevil; Kizilkaya, Simay (2021-10-04). "Electricity Generation Failures and Capacity Remuneration Mechanism in Turkey". SSRN. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3936571. S2CID 240873974. SSRN 3936571.
^ "What is the Capacity Market place (CM) and why do we need it?". EMR Settlement Limited . Retrieved 22 November 2021. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
^ "Capacity Market". Gov.United kingdom. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 1 March 2019. Archived from the original on 2015-06-28. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
^ "Capacity Market". Flexitricity. Archived from the original on 30 Apr 2021.
^ Provisional Auction Results T-4 Capacity Market Auction 2014 (PDF) (Report). National Grid. December 2014. Retrieved 22 Nov 2021.
^ Final Auction Results - T-4 Capacity Marketplace Auction for 2019/20 (PDF) (Written report). National Grid. December 2015. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
^ Final Auction Results - T-4 Chapters Market Sale for 2020/21 (PDF) (Written report). National Grid. December 2016.
^ ^a ^b ^c Capacity Market Prequalification User Back up Guide (PDF) (Report). National Grid. 8 August 2016. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
^ AEMO, Australian Free energy Market place Operator. "Managing frequency in the power system". AEMO . Retrieved 27 May 2020.